This study aims to examine the actual state of psychological, social, vocational, and aftercare services provided by civil society organizations, specifically the Taafi Association, from the perspective of its beneficiaries. The study employed a descriptive analytical approach and utilized a questionnaire administered to a purposive sample of 41 beneficiaries recovering from drug addiction in Dammam, The results indicated that the overall satisfaction with the association’s program was rated as “agree,” while participants’ responses regarding social, psychological, vocational rehabilitation, and aftercare services were mostly “neutral.” This suggests the presence of gaps in the quality or implementation of services. The study emphasized the importance of enhancing psychological and social support, expanding vocational rehabilitation programs, and improving communication during the aftercare phase. It recommended developing a more robust aftercare system and strengthening partnerships between non-governmental and official institutions.
Al-Otaibi,, H. B. K. (2025). The role of civil society organizations in supporting and containing recovering drug addicts: A study of beneficiaries of the Taafy Association. The journal Future of Social Sciences, 22(1), 107-142. doi: 10.21608/fjssj.2025.426630
MLA
Hind bint Khalid Al-Otaibi,. "The role of civil society organizations in supporting and containing recovering drug addicts: A study of beneficiaries of the Taafy Association", The journal Future of Social Sciences, 22, 1, 2025, 107-142. doi: 10.21608/fjssj.2025.426630
HARVARD
Al-Otaibi,, H. B. K. (2025). 'The role of civil society organizations in supporting and containing recovering drug addicts: A study of beneficiaries of the Taafy Association', The journal Future of Social Sciences, 22(1), pp. 107-142. doi: 10.21608/fjssj.2025.426630
VANCOUVER
Al-Otaibi,, H. B. K. The role of civil society organizations in supporting and containing recovering drug addicts: A study of beneficiaries of the Taafy Association. The journal Future of Social Sciences, 2025; 22(1): 107-142. doi: 10.21608/fjssj.2025.426630